Skip to content

Head to head

Anker 321 MagGo vs Anker 622 MagGo (2027)

Two 5,000mAh magnetic iPhone packs compared: the budget 321 against the stand-equipped 622, for 2027 iPhone owners.

TGBy TrueGear Research TeamIndependent editorial teamLast updated How we researchResearch-based assessment · Power Banks
Specs verified against manufacturer docs
No paid placements
Independently funded by readers
Updated 2026-11-01
Anker 321 MagGo vs Anker 622 MagGo (2027) featured graphic

What owners report

Most praised
  • Snapping it on one-handed while walking is the convenience owners keep coming back to
  • It turns a phone case pocket into a charging dock without adding a cable to the routine
  • The low price makes it the pack owners buy twice, one for a bag and one for a desk
Common complaints
  • Wireless charging speed disappoints buyers who expected wired-class refill times
  • A thick case makes the magnet slip at exactly the wrong moment, mid-walk
  • The missing cable in the box forces an extra purchase before the first recharge

What owners report

Most praised
  • The stand is what owners actually use daily, turning a battery into a desk companion
  • It holds onto the phone firmly enough for walking and commuting without sliding off
  • The thin profile means it stays attached during calls instead of being peeled off after charging
Common complaints
  • Slow wireless charging frustrates owners who charge during short breaks between meetings
  • Trying to charge earbuds by cable while the phone charges wirelessly simply does not work
  • Large-phone owners find the capacity covers only part of a day, not a full rescue

Our recommendation

These two share a battery, a wireless speed and a magnet, so the choice is about everything except charging. Buy the 321 if price and slimness matter most: it is cheaper, a touch slimmer, and it does the same magnetic job. Buy the 622 if you watch video or take calls while charging, because its foldable stand is a daily-use feature, not a gimmick, and it justifies the step up in price. Neither charges fast by wired standards, and neither should be bought for speed.

The stand is the whole difference

The 622's foldable kickstand props an iPhone in portrait or landscape, turning charging time into viewing time. The 321 has no stand, so watching video means leaning the phone against something or holding it. If your phone charges mostly in a pocket, the stand is dead weight; if it charges on a desk, it is the reason to buy the 622.

Identical charging, different boxes

Both packs hold 5,000mAh, charge wirelessly at up to 7.5W, and offer a 12W USB-C port. Both need a 12W or better charger for refilling. The 622 ships with a USB-C cable in the box, while the 321 ships without one, which narrows the price gap for first-time buyers who do not already own a spare cable.

Size and hand feel

The 321 is 0.59 inches thick and the 622 is 0.50 inches thick, so the stand-equipped pack is actually the slimmer of the two, though the 622 is slightly larger in footprint at 4.13 x 2.62 inches. In the hand the difference is small; in a pocket the 321's smaller footprint is marginally easier to forget.

Who each pack is really for

The 321 is the second-pack or first-magnetic-pack buy: cheap enough to own twice, simple enough to hand to anyone. The 622 is the primary-pack buy for someone who uses their phone as a screen while it charges. Both are iPhone-first products, and Android owners should look at wired packs instead.

Choose Anker Anker 321 MagGo Battery (PowerCore Magnetic 5K) if…

  • Price matters most and you want the cheapest magnetic charging here
  • The pack lives in a pocket, where a stand adds nothing
  • You already own USB-C cables for refilling
  • A smaller footprint beats a stand in your daily carry

Choose Anker Anker 622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo) if…

  • You watch video or take calls while the phone charges
  • A foldable stand you always carry beats a separate phone stand
  • The included USB-C cable saves a separate purchase
  • The slimmer 0.50-inch profile appeals to you

Questions, answered

Do both charge at the same speed?

Yes, for practical purposes. Both charge wirelessly at up to 7.5W and wired at up to 12W over USB-C. Neither is fast by modern wired standards, and the choice between them should never be made on charging speed.

Can the 622 charge a phone and earbuds at the same time?

No. A cabled device takes priority over wireless charging on the 622, so it charges one device at a time. The same single-device reality applies to most small magnetic packs, including the 321.

Which one is better for a large Pro Max iPhone?

Neither fully charges one. At 5,000mAh both deliver a partial charge to a Pro Max, roughly half to two-thirds depending on the model and usage. Large-phone owners who want a full rescue should step up to the 10,000mAh MagGo Slim instead.

Every guide on Power Banks15 pages